A recent article in WHO bulletin identified important challenges to make M Health initiatives sustain beyond demonstrations and pilots. (http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/90/5/11-099788/en/index.html). For the first time I saw some systems thinking evolving as the world begins to develop understanding of delivering healthcare at the bottom of the pyramid.
Disconnected development of applications in absence of significant alignment with healthcare delivery models, financing models and supply chain of goods and services is most likely to remain limited in its impact. I have attempted to express my views taking on board the lessons learnt from small pilots and looking towards a promise of better healthcare delivery system.
1. M-health needs to move towards sustainability and then develop an evidence base: It is desirable to build an evidence base for a new way of doing things but the real challenge is to ask the right research questions and measure the right things. Evaluating isolated systems not built on systems thinking may show some positive outcomes when compared to no intervention. Something will always be better than nothing, but does that provide answer to a range of issues and problems? Is the intervention scalable? Is it compatible with existing healthcare system and its drivers and does it align with regional/national agenda? How will a limited intervention (e.g. focussing on HIV or malaria or smoking using mobile phones) look like in light of bigger picture where equally important illnesses/contributing factors would need to be addressed?
What I am trying to emphasise is – it would be far better and perhaps sustainable for funding agency to support M health initiative as a part of larger drive to achieve a sustainable healthcare delivery system and then perform a rigorous evaluation to develop an evidence base. I don’t think an M Health intervention to support antenatal care and another to support HIV medication use and a third to track institutional delivery would deliver value as against a seamless one. Having a systems approach and collection of evidence in itself would still be limited if we cannot compare and Meta-analyse results across regions/countries. Therefore measuring similar parameters in standard format is perhaps the best way forward.
2. M-health systems should be interoperable with existing e-health initiatives and M-health should adopt and implement the same standards already present in e-health: These are essentially two sides of the same coin. There is no interoperability without standard based communication. If we continue to develop patchwork of interventions one for every disease and do not follow standards based coding then we will have the same problems as rest of the healthcare system, but probably even worse given lack of incentives and funding support post pilot. Moreover, many interventions tend to offer solutions without bringing physicians and hospital based systems into the loop. It may be harder in situations where private healthcare providers work independently, but again standards based design could easily enable opening of information pipelines as the model moves towards integration.
3. M-health should take an equitable and participatory approach: It is not only about patient’s participation in managing information but also provider’s participation is equally important. The issue becomes critical in developing world where illiteracy and disempowerment stand as barriers to patient participation. In such cases often intermediary health workers need to get involved. An ideal solution would enable transmission of data multidirectional between patients, providers, health workers and managers of the healthcare system. Such an approach will help to develop clinical and analytical grunt to the designing and planning and delivering services. Furthermore, participatory approach could be extended to the design process. Including potential stakeholders right from the start and designing while addressing each one’s needs would probably deliver a more sustainable intervention. A good healthcare system delivers for every one not just of the rich or the poor.
4. M-health needs to focus on health, not on the technology: Often the systems get designed with technology in forefront given the excitement of innovation. In healthcare, technology has always remained as an enabler of service provision - not a provider of services in itself. Ignoring this important principle has led to siloed, disconnected and incomplete solutions. Conceiving the services first and using workforce, technology, financing mechanisms and supply chain issues to seamlessly form a synthetic whole to design a healthcare delivery mechanism, is probably what we need. Technology has been tested, it will continue to evolve and become more reliable but in itself it will deliver limited advantage unless one sees technology in larger perspective of larger healthcare system.
9 comments:
Vascular Care Center is a hospital for treatment and consultation of vascular and endovascular disease related patients. Surgery services is also performed by most experienced and skilled surgeons. Vascular Surgeon Dr.G.V. Praveen Kumar performs Endovenous Laser Ablation Treatment. He had done many thousands of surgeries since 2008.
Website: www.vascularcarecenter.com
Email: info@vascularcarecenter.com
Contact: 9100666871,9908760544
Address: 6-3-649, Lane Beside Maheshwari Chambers, Somajiguda, HYDERABAD
We at Landmark Multispeciality Hospitals Hyderabad welcomes all innovations in health care.
Solve.Care is a revolutionary platform for healthcare management, which brings benefits to all stakeholders: Patients, employers, doctors & hospitals.
Thank you
ABR Neuro Multi Specialty Hospitals use expertise and experience to provide specialised treatment Best Neuro Hospitals In Hyderabad Most Advanced Neurology Hospital in Hyderabad for all Neurology Treatments. Treatment for all Neurology Diseases Get guidance from medical experts Team of Brain Specialists
Best Neuro Hospitals In Hyderabad
Thank you for sharing amazing information.....
Pediatric Hospital in KPHB
Thank you for sharing in formation...
Surgical Gastroenterologist in Hyderabad Cygnus hospital are well known Hospitals in Hyderabad for having the best surgical gastroenterologists in treating patients with problems of the gastric region, liver, and pancreas. hyderabad’s topmost and leading surgical gastroenterologists have done successful liver,
An experienced team of various specialist and surgical gastroenterologists in Hyderabad to offer advanced treatments for various gastrointestina
Surgical Gastroenterologist in Hyderabad
Thank you
HIEE as established as the Job Oriented Courses In Hyderabad. Our mechanical based training program helps you comprehend the basics of mechanical knowledge along with important terminologies, concepts, applicability.
These courses offered wide job opportunities and a large scale of pay concepts, applicability, and its impact. All the courses are short term courses of 2- 3 months for ITI, Diploma or B.Tech (Bachelor of Engineering) in Mechanical Engineering. The Listed courses are the best courses for mechanical engineers to get a job. At HIEE, we make it a priority to support you even after getting placed, just like family. Come join the family of HIEEhttps://www.hiee.in/job-oriented-training-for-eee-students.html
Thank You..
Famous Gastroenterologist in Hyderabad specialists of Cygnus Gastro Hospital has the best gastroenterologist specialists and a group of gastro-specialists and intensivists devoted in treating patients with gastrointestinal, liver, nerve bladder and pancreatic sicknesses. We have an aptitude of country's driving and great experts in gastrointestinal sicknesses. Our gastroenterologists are awesome and broadly perceived for giving advancement care of mind boggling stomach related infections.
We cygnus Hospitals is having one of the top gastroenterology doctors, gastroenterologist in Hyderabad
Post a Comment